Saturday, April 25, 2020

Which of the Following Might Be an Acceptable Topic While Writing a Process?

Which of the Following Might Be an Acceptable Topic While Writing a Process?You may have noticed that some documents require you to do more than just specify the purposes of a process and state whether or not a particular activity would be conducted in compliance with the regulations or laws that are being enforced. A few examples of processes that involve this would be leases, industrial applications, construction permits, and environmental assessments.Of course, there are several other documents that can require you to state the reasons for the proposed activities in compliance with the law or if they are being performed in order to avoid a violation of the law. While all of these documents are being written, each one will require you to use a different strategy to spell out what it is that you are trying to accomplish. This is a rather standard structure used to ensure that you do not forget to mention things that need to be done.To determine whether or not a document needs to use this strategy, the first thing that you must do is decide which of the following might be an acceptable topic while writing a process. Once you have determined which type of activity you are referring to, then you can determine which type of strategy will best fit your document. Some of the strategies include:* Reason: One of the most important techniques is to include why you are making a point of saying why something is being done. You must be sure that you explain why the activity must be performed in order to comply with the law or in order to be in compliance with another factor.* Need: If you are citing why an activity is necessary, this will be identified by using an explanatory phrase such as 'to meet a specific need'. This will be more difficult to convey to a non-English speaking person, but if you can translate it into a language that the person understands, you will find that this technique will make it easier for them to understand.* Purpose: Another technique that you can use is to mention one of the main reasons that you are doing the activity in the first place. By doing this, you will be able to convey the meaning of why the activity is required to be done.* Major Purpose: A last technique that you can use is to state a major purpose for doing the activity. This means that you will state what it is that you are trying to accomplish by performing the activity.Once you determine which of the above mentioned techniques works for your document, then you will be able to determine which of the following might be an acceptable topic while writing a process. Use a strategy to write down what the document is about.

Tips On How To Create A College Essay

Tips On How To Create A College EssayA college essay will be the single most important writing assignment in high school, and even the college essay will vary by school and program. It is an essential component of a college application, as well as an admission decision. There are so many factors to keep in mind when trying to create a good essay, however some elements will help to make the entire process easier.The first thing to do when preparing for a specific writing task is to write. If you find that your writing is one-sided and relies solely on your feelings, that will probably cause you to put it off and never finish it. Taking the time to write is very important. It is always advisable to do a quick read over of the question, topic, topic topics, etc. You should also read over the writing guidelines (the first page of the guidelines).Take a good look at the examples of essays that are already available. This can give you ideas on how to construct your own essay, and if it is based on a book or a movie, it may give you the impression that it can be more effective than others. Pay special attention to how much material is included, and what is left out. If you have any questions about these tips, see if they can be found in the guidelines or simply ask someone who is close to you.Another thing to consider is the basic rules of grammar and punctuation. Do not be afraid to check your work. With most writing assignments, you need to proofread and edit yourself. Some will do it with some degree of bias; try and avoid it. Every college essay is different and requires a unique style. Just remember that you will use your own unique style, not what is required by the college essay guidelines.Do not forget that in order to have a college essay for college admissions, you need to putin a certain amount of effort and determination. There are hundreds of college admissions tests, and hundreds of schools to apply to. When submitting your essay, be sure to put in the b est effort you can muster. You want your application to be as comprehensive as possible, which means your essay needs to be based on yourself and not the program you are applying to.Now that you have a good idea of what to do when creating a college essay, there are some tips on how to prepare. Writing is no easy task, but it can be done. If you have any problems when it comes to structuring your essay, look up resources, ask for help, or do it yourself.In all, a college essay for college admissions can make or break you. Make sure you put in the most effort you can, so that your essay makes an impact.

Quality Evaluation Essay Samples

Quality Evaluation Essay SamplesIn this article, I'll reveal to you the quality of the Evaluation Essay Sample that is available online. These sample essays are quite good in terms of quality and content because they are tested with a detailed set of questions. The questions cover the standard academic questions with the addition of subjects which are connected to the topic.When writing the essays, the students have to make sure that the topics are targeted on specific topics within the same subject. This will help in getting a better quality output. Since the Essay will be based on the test, the content will surely be tested first and then the formatting and layout need to be standardized. In this manner, the student can make sure that the essay is based on a well-structured essay.With the standardized formats, the students can also get a better understanding of the format. It will help them find the format suitable for their respective writing style. The teachers would be very happ y if the student can manage to write a well structured essay and present it in a thorough manner.The Evaluator will only know about the results of the evaluation essays by means of the evaluation samples. These samples were actually tested for grammatical issues as well as other good academic qualities. The teachers would be more than pleased if the students could write the essay in a very good manner. To facilitate the teachers, these samples are usually marked with the areas that need extra editing and examples where one could have inserted additional ideas.The Evaluation Essay Sample is usually printed and sent out for grading purposes. The students can have a chance to see how well the essay looks on the final paper. The teachers would be proud of the papers and would certainly be impressed.The best part of Evaluation Essay Sample is that they're free of cost and can be used without any restrictions. This way, the students can use them to improve their academic performance.Hopef ully this article can reveal to you the quality of the Evaluation Essay Sample that is available online. You should now be able to determine which of these samples would suit your particular area of interest.

Friday, March 20, 2020

Popular Conspiracy Theories About Lincolns Assassination

Popular Conspiracy Theories About Lincoln's Assassination Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) is one of the most famous Presidents of the United States. Volumes are devoted to his life and death. However, historians have yet to unravel the mysteries surrounding his assassination. The Assassination Abraham Lincoln and his wife, Mary Todd Lincoln attended the play, Our American Cousin at Fords Theatre on April 14, 1865. They were to be accompanied by General Ulysses S. Grant and his wife Julia Dent Grant. However, Grant and his wife changed their plans and did not attend the play. The Lincolns attended the play with Clara Harris and Henry Rathbone. During the play, actor John Wilkes Booth entered Lincolns State Box undetected and shot him in the back of the head. He also stabbed Henry Rathbone in the arm. After shooting the President, Booth jumped out of the box onto the stage, broke his left leg and yelled something that some eyewitnesses reported as, Sic Semper Tyrannus (As always to tyrants). Failed Assassinations by Co-conspirators Co-conspirator Lewis Powell (or Paine/Payne) attempted to assassinate Secretary of State William Seward, but only managed to injure him. David Herold accompanied Powell. However, Herold fled before the deed was finished. At the same time, George Atzerodt was supposed to have killed Vice-President, Andrew Johnson. Atzerodt did not go through with the assassination. Booth and Herold escaped the Capital and traveled to Mary Surratts Tavern in Maryland where they picked up supplies. They then traveled to Dr. Samuel Mudds house where Booths leg was set. Lincoln's Death Lincoln was taken to the Petersen House across the street from Fords Theater where he eventually died at 7:22 A.M. April 15, 1865. Secretary of War Edwin Stanton stayed with the Lincolns at the Petersen House and coordinated the efforts to capture the conspirators. Sentences of Deaths of the Conspirators On April 26, Herold and Booth were found hiding in a barn near Port Royal, Virginia. Herold surrendered but Booth refused to come out of the barn so it was set on fire. In the ensuing chaos, a soldier shot and killed Booth. Eight Lincoln conspirators were caught over the next few days and tried by a military court. They were found guilty on June 30 and given various sentences depending upon their involvement. Lewis Powell (Paine), David Herold, George Atzerodt and Mary Surratt were charged with conspiring with Booth along with various other crimes and hanged on July 7, 1865. Dr. Samuel Mudd was charged with conspiring with Booth and sentenced to life in prison. Andrew Johnson eventually pardoned him early in 1869. Samuel Arnold and Michael OLaughlen had conspired with Booth to kidnap President Lincoln and were found guilty and sentenced to life. OLaughlen died in prison but Arnold was pardoned by Johnson in 1869. Edman Spangler was found guilty of helping Booth escape from Fords Theater. He was also pardoned by Johnson in 1869. Pre-Assassination Abduction Was assassination the first goal? The general consensus today is that the first goal of the conspirators had been to kidnap the President. A few attempts to kidnap Lincoln fell through, and then the Confederacy surrendered to the North. Booths thoughts turned to killing the President. Up until recent times, however, there was a great deal of speculation as to the existence of an abduction plot. Some people felt it might be used to exonerate the hanged conspirators. Even the judge advocates feared talk of an abduction plot might lead to an innocent verdict for some if not all of the conspirators. They are believed to have suppressed important evidence such as John Wilkes Booths diary. (Hanchett, The Lincoln Murder Conspiracies, 107) On the other side, some people argued for the existence of a kidnapping plot because it bolstered their desire to connect Booth with a larger conspiracy masterminded by the Confederacy. With the abduction plot established, the question remains: Who was act ually behind and involved in the assassination of the President? The Simple Conspiracy Theory The simple conspiracy in its most basic form states that Booth and a small group of friends at first planned to kidnap the president. This eventually resulted in the assassination. In fact, the conspirators were to also assassinate Vice-President Johnson and Secretary of State Seward at the same time dealing a major blow to the government of the United States. Their goal was to give the South a chance to rise again. Booth saw himself as a hero. In his diary, John Wilkes Booth claimed that Abraham Lincoln was a tyrant and that Booth should be praised just as Brutus was for killing Julius Caesar. (Hanchett, 246) When Abraham Lincoln Secretaries Nicolay and Hay wrote their ten-volume biography of Lincoln in 1890 they presented the assassination as a simple conspiracy. (Hanchett, 102) The Grand Conspiracy Theory Even though personal Secretaries of Lincoln presented the simple conspiracy as the most likely scenario, they acknowledged that Booth and his co-conspirators had suspicious contacts with Confederate leaders. (Hanchett, 102). The Grand Conspiracy theory focuses on these connections between Booth and Confederate leaders in the south. Many variations exist of this theory. For example, it has been said that Booth had contact with Confederate leaders in Canada. It is worth noting that in April 1865 President Andrew Johnson issued a proclamation offering a reward for the arrest of Jefferson Davis in connection with the Lincoln assassination. He was arrested because of the evidence by an individual named Conover who was later found to have given false testimony. The Republican Party also allowed the idea of the Grand Conspiracy to fall by the wayside because Lincoln had to be a martyr, and they did not want his reputation sullied with the idea that anyone would want him killed but a madman. Eisenschmil's Grand Conspiracy Theory This conspiracy theory was a fresh look at the Lincoln assassination as investigated by Otto Eisenschiml and reported in his book Why Was Lincoln Murdered? It implicated the divisive figure Secretary of War Edwin Stanton. Eisenschiml purported that the traditional explanation of Lincolns assassination was unsatisfactory. (Hanchett, 157). This shaky theory is based on the supposition that General Grant would not have changed his plans to accompany the President to the theater on April 14th without an order. Eisenschiml reasoned that Stanton must have been involved in Grants decision because he is the only person other than Lincoln from whom Grant would have taken orders. Eisenschiml goes on to offer ulterior motives for many of the actions Stanton took immediately after the assassination. He supposedly left one escape route out of Washington, the one Booth just happened to take. The presidential guard, John F. Parker, was never punished for leaving his post. Eisenschiml also states th at the conspirators were hooded, killed and/or shipped off to a remote prison so they could never implicate anyone else. However, this is exactly the point where Eisenschimls theory collapses as do most other grand conspiracy theories. Several of the conspirators had ample time and opportunity to speak and implicate Stanton and numerous others if a grand conspiracy truly existed. (Hanchett, 180) They were questioned many times during captivity and, in fact, were not hooded through the entire trial. In addition, after being pardoned and released from prison, Spangler, Mudd, and Arnold never implicated anyone. One would think that men who reportedly hated the Union would relish the thought of toppling the leadership of the United States by implicating Stanton, one of the men instrumental in the Souths destruction. Lesser Conspiracies Numerous other Lincoln assassination conspiracy theories exist. Two of the most interesting, albeit incredible, involve Andrew Johnson and the papacy. Members of Congress tried to implicate Andrew Johnson in the assassination. They even called a special committee to investigate in 1867. The committee could not find any links between Johnson and the killing. It is interesting to note that Congress impeached Johnson that same year. The second theory as proposed by Emmett McLoughlin and others is that the Roman Catholic Church had reason to hate Abraham Lincoln. This is based on Lincolns legal defense of a former Priest against the Bishop of Chicago. This theory is further enhanced by the fact that the Catholic John H. Surratt, the son of Mary Surratt, fled America and ended up in the Vatican. However, the evidence connecting Pope Pius IX with the assassination is dubious at best. Conclusion The assassination of Abraham Lincoln has gone through many revisions during the past 153 years. Immediately following the tragedy, the Grand Conspiracy involving the Confederate leaders was the most widely accepted. Around the turn of the century, the Simple Conspiracy theory had gained a position of prominence. In the 1930s, Eisenschimls Grand Conspiracy theory arose with the publication of Why Was Lincoln Murdered? In addition, the years have been sprinkled with other outlandish conspiracies to explain the assassination. As time has passed, one thing is true, Lincoln has become and will remain an American icon lauded with an impressive strength of will and given credit for saving our nation from division and moral oblivion. Source Hanchett, William. The Lincoln Murder Conspiracies. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1983.

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

20 Evocative French Words

20 Evocative French Words 20 Evocative French Words 20 Evocative French Words By Mark Nichol English has borrowed words from other languages indiscriminately, and has done so for hundreds of years. Often, this happens even when a perfectly sound native or imported synonym already exists, but sometimes the new term gains its footing because it expresses a concept better than an existing term, or conveys a connotation or nuance no other single word or phrase does. But speakers and writers of English don’t always use the word as it is intended, leading to semantic drift. In the interests of preserving the purity of some highly evocative terms, here are twenty such words acquired from French: 1. Bà ªte noir (literally, â€Å"black beast†): someone to whom one is averse 2. Cachet (â€Å"seal†): originally, a seal or mark of approval; now, also (and primarily) used in a figurative sense meaning â€Å"prestige† (though it has additional meanings in philately, or stamp collecting) 3. Calque (â€Å"copy†): a literal translation of a word or phrase into one language from another, as in French-to-English vers libre (â€Å"free verse†) or English-to-French seconde main (â€Å"second hand†) 4. Dà ©tente (â€Å"relaxation†): an easing of political tensions; specifically, the thawing of the Cold War during the 1970s 5. Élan (â€Å"rush, impetus†): high spirit or enthusiasm 6. Ennui (â€Å"annoyance†): annoyance or boredom 7. Fà ªte (â€Å"feast, festival†): a celebration, or to celebrate 8. Haute couture (â€Å"high fashion†): High-quality custom tailoring, referring either to specific garments or to the industry; sometimes called simply couture 9. Lagniappe (from yapay, â€Å"to increase,† from the native South American language Quecha, by way of American Spanish and Louisiana French): a merchant’s small gift to a customer; in general usage, a modest bonus 10. Malaise (â€Å"discomfort†): a feeling of poor mental or physical health, or a sense of cultural unease 11. Mà ©tier (â€Å"work, ministry†): a type of work or other activity at which one excels 12. Panache (â€Å"small wing,† from Latin through Italian): flair or flamboyance 13. Parvenu (â€Å"new arrival†): an upwardly mobile newcomer to a socioeconomic class (synonym: â€Å"nouveau riche, or â€Å"newly rich†); the term is pejorative 14. Patois (â€Å"native or local speech†): a nonstandard dialect, especially the speech of uneducated or provincial speakers, or a jargon 15. Raconteur (â€Å"one who recounts†): a storyteller, or anyone skilled at relating anecdotes 16. Riposte (â€Å"retort†): originally the name of a fencer’s offensive response to an attack; now, also refers to the verbal equivalent, either spoken or written 17. Rouà © (literally, â€Å"broken on the wheel†): a hedonistic man (synonyms: libertine, rake); not to be confused with roux, a word for a flour-and-fat mixture used as a thickener 18. Sang-froid (literally, â€Å"cold blood†): self-possession under pressure 19. Savant (â€Å"one who knows,† from savoir, â€Å"to know†): a learned person, especially a specialist; also a shortening of â€Å"idiot savant,† a clinical term for a mentally disabled person with anomalous skill or ability in one area of learning, or a casual term for someone whose knowledge is almost exclusively in one subject 20. Timbre (â€Å"quality of a sound†): the particular characteristics of a musical note or other sound Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:45 Synonyms for â€Å"Food†7 Patterns of Sentence StructureUsing "May" in a Question

Monday, February 17, 2020

The three pillars of the Ken Blanchard College of Business Essay

The three pillars of the Ken Blanchard College of Business - Essay Example A servant leader has a vision. Having vision means possessing an ideal image of what the future might become. The leader, who has a vision, establishes a strategic visionary plan for the institution. Vision does the work of uniting and inspiring greatness among members of the organization. Vision facilitates institutional change and transformations. A servant leader is honesty and is also a person with integrity. Honesty and Integrity are the essentials of good leadership. Honest is the trustfulness of a leader while integrity refers to the leader’s adherence to a moral code. An effective institutional leader tells the truth, keeps promises, practices fairness, and respects individuals (Russell and Stone, 2002). A servant leader is trustworthy. Trust refers to the willingness of the leader to rely on employees to perform their duties without the need for supervision. In any institution, trust contributes to good member relations, high productivity, and effective leadership. Building trust in an institution involves demonstrating care for workers and practicing integrity. Servant leaders appreciate other people. They encourage, value and care for their followers. They are also interested in seeing other people succeed. Servant leaders show care for their workers and prioritize their needs and interests. Entrepreneurship spirit involves challenging the norm, pursuing opinions, and acting with determination. It influences economic growth, reduces unemployment and facilitates modernization. Entrepreneurs are unique; they can be identified from the issues they pursue in life. They tend to seek autonomy more than the attainment of wealth in life. They are people who are flexible for any changes in life. Entrepreneurs do much better in self-enhancement values compared to self-transcendence values. To them, personal success is a great achievement in life (Licht,

Monday, February 3, 2020

Thinking about surveillance in the city Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words - 1

Thinking about surveillance in the city - Essay Example Closed-circuit cameras have become common in cities and they have become an important aspect of city security. Security teams and personnel form an important aspect of the city surveillance teams. Control of urban space and inaugurated surveillance measures are widely used worldwide. Ethical, legal and even moral questions arise when there is mass surveillance and accumulation of personal data from individuals without their knowledge and consent. The film and movie industry has always illustrated how city surveillance has become crucial and important in the modern age. One of the most iconic films that represents the divergent views on city surveillance is Minority Report (2002). It is vital to study and understand how minority report represents and handles the various views on mass or city surveillance through scholarly analysis2. Minority Report is a movie that was directed by Steven Spielberg based on Philip Dick’s Sci-Fi short story â€Å"The Minority Report† written in 1956. The film is set in 2054 in a modernized Washington DC where crime and murder have been wholly eliminated. Tom cruise takes the character of John Anderton, who is the head of a Pre-crime, a unit under the Justice department that works in the Jurisdiction of Washington D.C. Three psychic human beings called precogs have been harnessed and their power to see future crimes projected on computers. The precogs have the ability to see images of future murders and those who are identified are apprehended before they commit crimes after which they are incarcerated. The pre-crime unit is to face a national vote on its effectiveness and take it from the Washington D.C. jurisdiction to a national level. Anti-pre-crime advocates such as Danny Witwer who oppose the move. Witwer has been sent by the Justice department to access the abi lity and effectiveness of pre-crime. Pre-crime surveillance is 100 percent accurate but while at the labs, John Anderton becomes